lunedì 28 gennaio 2019

SIMENON SIMENON. THE NOVELIST LOOKS FOR CRIMINAL ANTECEDENTS

Simenon’s ahead of time look at perpetrators in his autobiographical work Three Crimes 

SIMENON SIMENON. LE ROMANCIER CHERCHE DES ANTECEDENTS CRIMINELS 
Le regard ‘en avant’ de Simenon dans son œuvre autobiographique “Les trois crimes de mes amis”
SIMENON SIMENON. IL ROMANZIERE CERCA DEI PRECEDENTI CRIMINALI
Lo sguardo "in avanti" di Simenon nella sua opera autobiografica "Les trois crimes de mes amis"

In this workcalled an “autobiographical story” by its author, Simenon ponders what factors propelled some of his “friends” during his teenage years into criminal actions. He begins by indicating he will be retrospectively studying eventual murderers through examination of “the front” and not “the end.” That is, he will look for Why? How? Which way did it begin?” Here is the rogue’s gallery he presents:
Most prominent is Danse who, as a four-year-old, seemed destined for psychological trouble because his mother had him watch a farmer kill a sow by clubbing its head and slitting its throat. Later on, as an adult bookseller, he enjoys taking advantage of his customers, young Georges included. In particular, a “passion for prepubescent females causes him to “entice little girls” into his “close-shuttered shop” although the autobiographer denies knowing “exactly what he did with their underdeveloped bodies. Danse is dishonest, “a liar and a half.” A skillful manipulator and a real con man, according to Georges, “he put all of us in his pocket.” Danse progressively displays megalomania and paranoia. He often acts like “a madman” stimulating speculation “he had always been crazy.” He takes up blackmailing until exposed, causing him to flee Belgium for France. There, assuming a false identity, he pimps his mistress to get funds to live onAlready the author of strange poems, he deteriorates into publishing fake interviews and articles of self-praise. His weird behavior is frightening people around him when he commits his major crimes. 
Almost as prominent is Deblauwe. He is a slick wheeler-dealer who drags young Georges down, putting drugs in his drinks and taking him to whore houses. Another blackmailer as a newspaper owner, he hires eager young reporter Georges as a front. He is another pimp who abuses his mistress, “making more off her than he earns at the newspaper” by luring students with food and drink to an apartment he rents for her. He moves his mistress into a whorehouse where “a woman who knows how to do it doesn’t have time to breathe” because there she can make more money—for him, of course. When she falls in love with a rival, Deblauwe’s 87 threatening letters get ignored, so he steps up to his major crime. 
More peripheral is Fakir, a pretender, swindleroccultist, hypnotist, and palm reader. He preys on those “who were partying and had money in their pockets,” mostly the vulnerable young. He orchestrates drunken seances and orgies. He provides and probably sells drugs, especially cocaine, a material precipitant in what becomes his major crime.  
Even more peripheral in Simenon’s presentation is Little K, a poor lost soul whose drunken father beat his mother to death, but that’s it for antecedents. He is mostly a drunk until cocaine takes the upper hand, making him a victim, if not a criminal.  
Finally, The Two Brothers are bit players with multiple misbehaviors described, but little is provided to give insight into what makes them tick. 
In the end, hampered by a disjointed style and numbers that do not add up, this ‘three crime’ work falls short of providing expected answers to Simenon’s primary question of whether “pre-established sequences exist for these sorts of destinies. 

David P Simmons 

domenica 27 gennaio 2019

LES ADVERSAIRES DE MAIGRET

Portraits de quelques criminels dans la saga 

SIMENON SIMENON. GLI AVVERSARI DI MAIGRET 
Ritratti di alcuni criminali nella saga 
SIMENON SIMENON. MAIGRET'S OPPONENTS 
Portraits of some criminals in the saga 


Un adversaire digne de Maigret

Bruno Crémer et Jean Yanne
Les «duels» de Maigret se passent parfois entre adversaires de même force, morale et/ou physique. Que l'on songe par exemple, au «combat de poids lourds» qui a lieu entre le commissaire et Guillaume Serre dans Maigret et la Grande Perche; mais dans ce cas, l'avantage tournera au profit du commissaire, parce que si les deux hommes se ressemblent au physique, la puissance morale de Maigret est nettement plus grande que celle de Serre. D'autres adversaires aussi puissants physiquement et moralement que Maigret se rencontrent dans la saga. En particulier Emile Ducrau dans l'Ecluse no 1. Ducrau est ce qu'on appelle une «force de la nature», ce qui ne l'empêche pas d'avoir, comme n'importe quel être humain, ses faiblesses. Et c'est évidemment cela que Maigret finira par mettre au jour, après avoir mené une longue lutte avec cet adversaire digne de lui, «un personnage qui valait vraiment la peine d'être connu», comme le commissaire le qualifie lui-même. Ducrau a beau jouer les forts, Maigret aura tôt fait de déceler ses failles. Et si cette fois, le commissaire finit par inculper Ducrau, ne lui a-t-il pas permis de retrouver lui-même sa propre vérité, en avouant son crime et en se montrant sous son vrai jour à ses proches ?... 
   

Un avversario degno di Maigret

Jean Richard et Alfred Adams
I « duelli» di Maigret si svolgono talvolta con avversari della sua stessa forza morale e fisica. Comunque la si pensi per esempio al « combattimento tra pesi massimi » che ha luogo tra il commissario e Guillaume Serre in Maigret e la Stangona ; ma in questo caso il vantaggio sarà a favore del commissario perché se i due uomini si somigliano nel fisico, la forza morale di Maigret è decisamente maggiore di quella di Serre. Altri avversari altrettanto forti fisicamente e moralmente di Maigret si incontrano nella serie. In particolare Emile Ducrau ne La chiusa no 1. Ducrau è quello che si dice una « forza della natura », che non gli impedisce di avere, come qualsiasi essere umano, le sue debolezze. Ed è proprio questo che Maigret porterà alla luce, dopo aver condotto un lunga lottta con questo avversario degno di lui, « un personaggio che valeva la pena di essere conosciuto » come lo definisce lui stesso. Ducrau ha buon gioco a giocare duro, Maigret scoprirà presto i suoi difetti. E se in questo caso il commissario finisce per incolpare Ducrau, non gli ha permesso di trovare lui stesso la sua verità, confessando il suo crimine e mostrandosi agli altri nella sua vera luce?... 


A worthy opponent to Maigret 


Maigret's "duels" are sometimes taking place between opponents of same strength, whether morally or physically. We can think, for example, about the "heavyweight fight" between the Chief Inspector and Guillaume Serre in Maigret and the Tall Womanyet in this case the advantage will be in favour of the Chief Inspector, because even if the two men look alike physically, Maigret's moral strength is clearly greater than Serre's. We can meet other opponents as physically and morally powerful as Maigret in the saga. In particular Emile Ducrau in Lock No 1. Ducrau is what we call a "force of nature", which doesn't prevent him from having, like any human being, his weaknesses. And of course it's this that Maigret will end by uncovering, after having led a long fight against this worthy opponent, "a character who was worth being known", as the Chief Inspector asserts. Ducrau may well pretend being strong, Maigret will soon detect his flaws. And even if this time the Chief Inspector ended by charging Ducrau, didn't he allow him to find his own truth by confessing his crime and showing his true self to his familiars?... 

Murielle Wenger